点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
（新春走基层）探访重庆火车北站春运：行囊装满喜悦 温暖守护归程******
中新网重庆1月12日电 题：探访重庆火车北站春运：行囊装满喜悦 温暖守护归程
作者 张霁雯
虽正值深冬，但重庆近日来阳光明媚，充满暖意。春节临近，重庆火车北站地面广场往来旅客络绎不绝。有的拖着行李箱，步履匆匆，有的携妻带子，笑声朗朗，还有的成群结队、谈笑风生，静候列车的到来......
随着2023年春运正式拉开帷幕，作为重庆主要铁路集散地之一的火车北站忙碌而有序，客流呈现回暖态势。于旅客，这是承载着归家喜悦的温馨旅途，于护航春运的各相关部门，这只守护平安与畅通的用心坚守。
多措并举 助力旅客便捷出行
春运期间，随着客流量逐渐增加，重庆北站物业服务单位——两江产业集团旗下渝高物业公司火车北站项目部客服岗4名工作人员愈加忙碌。他们穿梭在地面广场、进出站口、站台扶梯等各处，做好指引和帮扶服务，协助南来北往的旅客顺利踏上返乡归途，“橘色马甲”的身影格外醒目。
图为旅客们踏上返乡之路。 张霁雯 摄“姑娘，我要坐高铁，应该从哪里进站......”北2进站口，一位独行的老婆婆攥着纸片，寻求帮助。张艺见状立即来到她身旁，根据纸片信息，耐心地指导其如何找到进站口、车次、检票口，送对方顺利进站后才离开。
在北广场，高雨涵的视线始终落在旅客身上，“我们的工作包括为旅客提供乘车咨询，路线指引，失物招领等服务，因为许多旅客有换乘长途汽车和轨道交通的需要，这几天问路的情况较多。”她说。
身着制服的安保人员则穿梭在地面广场、地下车库、出租车上客区、消防监控中心等地，分班组24小时不间断巡逻值守。安保人员李胜告诉记者，巡逻期间重点开展安全隐患排查，客流引导，规范停车，疏散交通等工作，同时向周边商户加强用火用电安全、应急演练、烟花爆竹禁燃禁携带宣传，压紧压实安全生产责任，提升事故防范处置能力。
为旅客营造一个干净整洁的出行环境尤为重要，北站项目部在加派保洁人手、增加保洁设施设备的同时，还制定了详细的保洁方案，划定以地面广场、城市通廊、换乘大厅、出租车道、公共卫生间为主的重点区域。
据重庆火车北站地区综合管理局消息，经预测，春运期间重庆北站预计发送旅客388万人，客流高峰日将在1月18日(腊月二十七)左右出现。“就目前的预售情况来看，郑渝高铁方向的车票比较紧俏。预计1月20日、21日的车票预售也将非常火爆。”北站项目部经理邓吉利说。项目部将配合站区相关单位做好春运服务保障，不断延伸工作触角，扩大服务半径，完善便民功能，确保春运期间旅客出发安全、返程顺利。
图为进站旅客络绎不绝。 张霁雯 摄回家路上 充满兴奋与期待
“麻烦帮我拍张照，谢谢。”在南广场，来自天津南开区的张先生请记者帮忙留下了一张北站“打卡”照，随后传到了家庭群里。这是他第一次来西南地区旅游，从成都一路游玩到重庆，正准备带着满满的收获回乡。
“在重庆，我逛了解放碑、洪崖洞，体验了‘轻轨穿楼’，山城步道爬到腿软，给我留下了深刻的印象。”张先生说，旅途非常愉快，已经迫不及待想要回去和家人分享了。
老家在湖北荆州的赵先生拖着行李箱，肩上还挂着一个大袋子，都是重庆的“土特产”，“有火锅底料、老腊肉、麻花、米花糖等，带给亲戚家孩子尝尝。”
听到有食物，一旁赵先生的小儿子兴奋地嚷嚷了起来：“我想吃奶奶家的风干鸡和鱼糕。”“快了快了，我们的列车12点就开咯！”说着说着，一家人走向了候车厅。
发车时间还早，来自合川的向先生和同伴们正在北广场上晒太阳聊天，他们在河北务工，前一天才刚回重庆。“坐高铁再转汽车，今天晚上就能到家。”说起回家，他们眼中全是期待，隔着口罩，难掩兴奋。(完)
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)